Swept for general-contractors

General Contractors websites for Swept that stop handoff leaks

We are frustrated that swept does not document public website embeds, API access, or webhooks for request capture. Use the website for qualification, CRM/email for sales workflow, and manual Swept onboarding after contract acceptance, which turns the website into a handoff delay.

No public API
No native embeds
Manual ops handoff
Swept handoff
General Contractors intake

Take the CRM Scorecard

GC projects need qualification depth before operations

We are frustrated that generic intake creates bid churn because teams must reconstruct scope, timeline, and project type.

Bid turnaround slows and win rates decline.

What a Swept-centered GC website does instead

Capture scope and timeline on-site, route to CRM/email for consultation/proposal, then manually enter accepted projects into Swept for execution.

Native option

No documented native Swept request-capture embeds.

API option

No documented public Swept API for website request ingestion.

How the handoff works (truthful to Swept)

Recommended

Hybrid: Website form → CRM/email → manual entry into Swept

Website and CRM/email cover pre-sale; Swept is post-sale operations.

When to use: Always, given Swept’s documented public integration limits.

Boundary-safe

Fallback manual handoff

When Swept does not document a richer write path, the website still captures the right context and keeps the unsupported steps manual instead of implied.

When to use: Use this when the platform boundary needs to stay explicit and manual review is safer than inference.

What the website captures for general contractors

Capture enough for an efficient first qualification call.

Project type (optional)
Routes to the right consultation flow.
Property/site address
Required for planning and site visit.
Timeline target
Aligns scheduling and proposal sequencing.
Budget range (optional)
Improves qualification.
Scope notes (optional)
Reduces discovery loops.
Plans/photos (optional)
Improves estimate triage.

Typical general contractor + Swept workflows

Consultation request

Trigger: Prospect requests project consultation.

Capture: Website captures scope and timeline.

Platform: Sales workflow in CRM/email; Swept onboarding after acceptance.

Planned project pipeline

Trigger: Prospect plans a future project.

Capture: Website captures start window and constraints.

Platform: Request remains outside Swept until sold.

Time-sensitive project

Trigger: Prospect has near-term requirements.

Capture: Website captures urgency and core scope.

Platform: Sales triage first; manual Swept setup post-acceptance.

Why this isn’t a direct website → Swept integration

Swept is operations-focused

Public docs position Swept around post-sale execution.

No public intake API

Avoid undocumented automation claims.

Cleaner accountability

CRM/email owns pre-sale; Swept owns delivery operations.

Frequently asked questions

Can website GC requests auto-create Swept projects?

Not via a documented public API or embed. Use CRM/email first, then manual Swept onboarding after acceptance.

Does Swept provide a request widget?

No documented native public request-capture widget is provided.

What should Swept handle?

Post-sale operations and workforce execution.

How do we avoid scope loss?

Capture consultation fields on-site and use a structured manual transfer into Swept.

Start your general contractors System Check for Swept

We’ll map qualification-first website intake and practical manual onboarding into Swept. If the preview shows the fit is real, the build scope gets clarified before you commit and the next bottleneck stays visible instead of getting buried in a proposal maze.