Swept for excavation-grading

Excavation Grading websites for Swept that stop handoff leaks

We are frustrated that swept does not document public website embeds, API access, or webhooks for request capture. Capture excavation requests on-site, route to CRM/email for estimating, then manually onboard accepted projects into Swept, which turns the website into a handoff delay.

No public API
No native embeds
Manual ops handoff
Swept handoff
Excavation Grading intake

Take the CRM Scorecard

Sitework requests need scope detail before operations

We are frustrated that generic form fills leave teams chasing basic scope and access details before they can estimate accurately.

Response windows stretch while the team rebuilds missing project context.

What a Swept-centered excavation website does instead

Capture job type, site conditions, and timeline on the website, run sales/estimating in CRM/email, then manually create operational records in Swept after acceptance.

Native option

Swept does not provide native public request-capture embeds.

API option

Swept does not document a public API for website request ingestion.

How the handoff works (truthful to Swept)

Recommended

Hybrid: Website form → CRM/email → manual entry into Swept

Website handles intake, CRM/email handles estimating, Swept handles operations post-sale.

When to use: Always, given Swept’s documented lack of public marketing intake integrations.

Boundary-safe

Fallback manual handoff

When Swept does not document a richer write path, the website still captures the right context and keeps the unsupported steps manual instead of implied.

When to use: Use this when the platform boundary needs to stay explicit and manual review is safer than inference.

What the website captures for excavation and grading

Capture enough detail to triage estimate complexity quickly.

Project type (optional)
Routes the request to the right estimator.
Site address
Required for planning and routing.
Approximate area/volume (optional)
Improves estimate triage.
Timeline window
Aligns scheduling expectations.
Access/site constraints (optional)
Prevents planning delays.
Plans/photos (optional)
Reduces discovery loops.

Typical excavation + Swept workflows

Estimate request

Trigger: A prospect requests sitework pricing.

Capture: Website captures scope and site details.

Platform: Estimating runs in CRM/email; Swept onboarding is manual post-sale.

Planned project intake

Trigger: A prospect plans future site work.

Capture: Website captures timeline and constraints.

Platform: Request stays outside Swept until acceptance.

Time-sensitive request

Trigger: A request needs near-term mobilization.

Capture: Website captures urgency and access notes.

Platform: Sales triage outside Swept; ops setup follows acceptance.

Why this isn’t a direct website → Swept integration

Post-sale platform fit

Swept is documented for operations, not top-of-funnel request capture.

No public intake API

Do not promise undocumented website sync into Swept.

Clear workflow boundaries

Sales and ops stages stay explicit and measurable.

Frequently asked questions

Can excavation requests auto-create records in Swept?

Not through a documented public API or embed. Use CRM/email first, then manual Swept onboarding post-acceptance.

Does Swept provide a website request widget?

No documented native request-capture widget is provided for public sites.

What should Swept manage?

Operational execution after projects are sold.

How do we avoid losing scope details?

Capture estimator fields on the website and use a fixed manual transfer checklist into Swept.

Start your excavation and grading System Check for Swept

We’ll map estimate-ready website intake and practical post-sale onboarding into Swept. If the preview shows the fit is real, the build scope gets clarified before you commit and the next bottleneck stays visible instead of getting buried in a proposal maze.