Swept for concrete-epoxy

Concrete epoxy websites for Swept with an honest ops handoff

We are frustrated that swept is built for post-sale operations and does not document public website embeds, API access, or webhooks for request capture. This flow captures epoxy project requests on the website, routes them to CRM/email for estimating, and only hands accepted work into Swept via manual entry, which turns the website into a handoff delay.

No public API
No native embeds
Manual ops handoff
Swept handoff
Concrete Epoxy intake

Take the CRM Scorecard

Epoxy quoting needs scope detail before operations

We are frustrated that if your site tries to automate website intake into Swept, it depends on an integration surface Swept does not document publicly.

Requests stall while the team re-asks floor type, rough square footage, and timeline.

What a Swept-centered concrete epoxy website does instead

Capture project scope on-site, route to CRM/email for estimating and follow-up, then manually create operational records in Swept only after the job is won. This aligns with Swept’s documented post-sale focus.

Native option

Swept does not provide native website embeds for public request capture.

API option

Swept does not document a public API for website request ingestion; plan a manual handoff into Swept.

How the handoff works (truthful to Swept)

Recommended

Hybrid: Website form → CRM/email → manual entry into Swept

The website captures floor scope and timing, sales/estimating runs in CRM or inbox, and ops manually onboards won work into Swept.

When to use: Always, because Swept does not document public embeds, API, or webhooks for marketing intake.

Boundary-safe

Fallback manual handoff

When Swept does not document a richer write path, the website still captures the right context and keeps the unsupported steps manual instead of implied.

When to use: Use this when the platform boundary needs to stay explicit and manual review is safer than inference.

What the website captures for concrete epoxy

Capture estimate-ready details so the first follow-up is productive.

Floor type/use case (optional)
Sets coating assumptions.
Approximate square footage (optional)
Improves estimate triage.
Service address
Required for routing and scheduling.
Project timing window
Sets realistic scheduling expectations.
Surface condition notes (optional)
Flags prep requirements.
Photos (optional)
Reduces discovery calls.

Typical concrete epoxy + Swept workflows

Estimate request intake

Trigger: A prospect requests a concrete coating quote.

Capture: The website captures scope and timing.

Platform: Sales/estimating runs outside Swept. After acceptance, ops manually enters work into Swept.

Planned project inquiry

Trigger: A prospect requests work in a future window.

Capture: The website captures schedule constraints.

Platform: Request is handled in CRM/email first; Swept is used post-sale.

Commercial request

Trigger: A commercial prospect requests a scoped project.

Capture: The website captures floor use, timing, and access notes.

Platform: Ops setup in Swept happens after contract acceptance.

Why this isn’t a direct website → Swept integration

Swept is operations-first

Swept is documented as post-sale workforce/ops software.

No public request-capture API

Do not promise undocumented automation into Swept.

Cleaner handoff

CRM/email owns sales intake; Swept owns execution after acceptance.

Frequently asked questions

Can our epoxy quote form create jobs in Swept automatically?

Not via a documented public API or embed. Use website → CRM/email, then manual entry into Swept after acceptance.

Does Swept provide a website widget?

No documented native website embed surface is provided for public request capture.

What should Swept handle in this workflow?

Operational execution after the job is sold.

How do we reduce double entry?

Capture complete project scope on the website and use a standardized manual onboarding checklist for Swept.

Start your concrete epoxy flooring System Check for Swept

We’ll map an estimate-ready intake flow and a clean manual handoff into Swept after acceptance. If the preview shows the fit is real, the build scope gets clarified before you commit and the next bottleneck stays visible instead of getting buried in a proposal maze.